Relationships between crest-bearing houses and tribes
Relationships between Crest-Bearing Houses and Tribes
Under Ts’msyen law, crests do not belong to tribes as abstract groups. They are carried by specific houses (*wilp / waap*), and through those houses they create lawful relationships **within and across Ts’msyen tribes**.
Crests are one of the primary ways Ts’msyen law maintains unity without erasing local authority.
Foundational Understanding
Crests are house-held, not tribal possessions.
They:
- belong to specific wilp
- carry defined responsibilities
- derive authority from adaawx and witness
- connect houses through shared legal relationships
Tribes are composed of houses; law flows through houses first.
Houses as Primary Legal Units
Under ayaawx:
- the wilp is the primary bearer of authority
- crests are held and exercised by houses
- rights and responsibilities attach to houses, not populations
Tribal identity does not override house law.
Crests as Cross-Tribal Connectors
The same crest may appear in houses belonging to different Ts’msyen tribes.
This reflects:
- shared origins recorded in adaawx
- historical movement and settlement
- alliances formed through law and marriage
- lawful transfer or recognition of responsibility
Shared crests do not imply shared territory or merged authority.
Lawful Relationship, Not Hierarchy
When houses across tribes carry related crests:
- neither house gains supremacy over the other
- authority remains tied to each house’s territory and responsibility
- relationships are governed by protocol, not dominance
Crests connect lawfully; they do not centralize power.
Clans (Pdeex) and Crest Relationships
Clan systems provide structure for crest relationships.
Clans:
- group houses through lineage
- maintain balance and neutrality
- enable recognition across distance
- prevent isolation of authority
Crests operate within clan law, not outside it.
Territorial Limits
A shared crest does not grant:
- automatic access to another house’s land
- authority beyond one’s own territory
- decision-making power over another wilp
Territory remains defined by adaawx and stewardship, not by crest alone.
Protocols Between Houses
Where crest-bearing houses interact across tribes:
- protocol governs conduct
- permission must be sought where required
- responsibilities must be respected
- disputes are resolved through law and witness
Crests guide relationship; protocol governs action.
Use in Diplomacy and Cooperation
Crest relationships may support:
- diplomacy between tribes
- cooperation on shared waters or routes
- mutual aid in times of need
- lawful negotiation and settlement
These uses depend on consent and proper process.
Witness and Recognition
Relationships between crest-bearing houses are affirmed through:
- feast and public witness
- acknowledgment by clans
- repetition through practice
- correction where misuse occurs
Unwitnessed claims of relationship have no legal standing.
Protection Against Misuse
Misuse occurs when crests are treated as:
- tribal ownership symbols
- identity badges without responsibility
- justification for territorial claims
- substitutes for consent
Such misuse is corrected under ayaawx.
Teaching These Relationships
Youth are taught that:
- crests connect law, not entitlement
- relationships require respect and restraint
- shared symbols do not erase boundaries
- authority follows responsibility
Understanding prevents conflict and confusion.
Living Relationships
Relationships between crest-bearing houses are living.
They:
- adapt through lawful renewal
- respond to new circumstances
- remain accountable through witness
- preserve unity without erasing difference
Through these relationships, Ts’msyen law remains interconnected and whole.