Inter-House and Inter-Tribal Dispute Law

From We Are Ts'msyen
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Inter-House and Inter-Tribal Dispute Law

Category: Tsm’syen Law Page status: Working

Purpose

This page describes how disputes between houses, and between distinct peoples or tribes, are addressed within Tsm’syen law. It records principles governing recognition of harm, responsibility, witnessing, and restoration across boundaries of house and community.

This page does not establish courts or external enforcement bodies.

General principles

  • Disputes create imbalance beyond a single house.
  • Law prioritizes restoration of balance between parties.
  • Responsibility extends beyond individuals to houses.
  • Witnessing is required for legitimacy.
  • Resolution must respect the autonomy of all parties involved.

INTER-HOUSE DISPUTES

Between houses

  • Inter-house disputes arise when harm affects more than one house.
  • Houses retain responsibility for the conduct of their members.
  • Resolution requires engagement between houses, not unilateral action.
  • Ayaawx guides acceptable forms of acknowledgment and repair.

INTER-TRIBAL DISPUTES

Between peoples

  • Inter-tribal disputes occur between distinct peoples or Nations.
  • No party may impose resolution unilaterally.
  • Respect for the law and governance of other peoples is required.
  • Lawful engagement depends on mutual recognition and restraint.

ROLE OF HOUSES

Collective responsibility

  • Houses represent their members in disputes.
  • Compensation and repair are addressed at the house level.
  • Failure of a house to respond affects its standing.
  • Collective responsibility reinforces accountability.

ROLE OF ELDERS

Guidance and interpretation

  • Elders may assist in interpreting law and precedent.
  • Guidance focuses on balance, memory, and consequence.
  • Elders do not substitute for the responsibility of houses.
  • Trust limits the scope of elder involvement.

WITNESS

Legitimacy and memory

  • Dispute resolution requires witnesses.
  • Witnesses confirm acknowledgment, process, and outcome.
  • Witnessing prevents private or coerced settlements.
  • Public memory preserves the legitimacy of resolution.

RESTORATION

Repair and balance

  • Resolution seeks to repair relationships and restore balance.
  • Restoration may include apology, compensation, or other appropriate acts.
  • Completion of restoration restores standing between parties.
  • Unresolved harm sustains imbalance.

LIMITS

Boundaries

  • Not all disputes can be resolved immediately.
  • Persistent refusal to engage undermines*
Retrieved from "https://luudisk.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Inter-House_and_Inter-Tribal_Dispute_Law&oldid=228"