Elders are recognized through age, experience, and conduct
Elders Are Recognized Through Age, Experience, and Conduct
Statement
Elders are recognized through age, experience, and conduct.
Meaning
In Tsm’syen law, elder status is not assigned, elected, or granted by office.
Elders are recognized over time through:
- Age lived within the community
- Experience carrying responsibility
- Consistent lawful conduct
Recognition arises naturally through observation and trust.
Age
Age reflects time lived under law.
It carries:
- Exposure to multiple generations
- Memory of change and continuity
- Perspective shaped by consequence
- Familiarity with long-standing ayaawx and adaawx
Age alone is not sufficient, but it matters.
Experience
Experience reflects responsibility carried.
It includes:
- Participation in disputes and restorations
- Witnessing lawful and unlawful conduct
- Service to house, clan, or community
- Enduring the outcomes of decisions made
Experience without responsibility does not create elder authority.
Conduct
Conduct confirms legitimacy.
Recognition depends on:
- Restraint in the use of influence
- Willingness to be corrected
- Respect for limits and jurisdiction
- Refusal to dominate or exploit
- Accountability before witnesses
Past conduct remains relevant.
Recognition, not appointment
Elders are not created by:
- Titles
- Committees
- Elections
- External recognition
- Self-identification
Elder status exists only while recognition continues.
Loss of recognition
Recognition may weaken or withdraw when:
- Conduct becomes harmful or self-serving
- Trust is broken
- Law is misused or ignored
- Authority is claimed rather than demonstrated
Respect does not prevent correction.
Relationship to law
Elder recognition supports law but does not override it.
Elders remain subject to:
- Ayaawx
- Adaawx
- Witnesses
- Lawful limits
Cross-references
- Elders as Interpreters of Law
- Elders are Carriers of Legal Memory
- Authority Arises from Trust, Conduct, and Knowledge
- Elders Operate Within, Not Above, Tsm’syen Law
- Interpretation Does Not Equal Unilateral Decision-Making
- Witnesses and Public Memory
- Limits on Authority
- Balance Across Houses and Clans
- Names as Legal Continuity