Relationship to specific lands and waters

From We Are Ts'msyen
Revision as of 01:39, 13 January 2026 by Amusterer (talk | contribs) (initiation arm)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Relationship to specific lands and waters

Relationship to specific lands and waters establishes authority, responsibility, and law through place-based connection. This relationship is not abstract or general—it is precise, named, and remembered.

Land and water are not interchangeable. Each place carries its own history and obligation.

Place-based relationship

Relationship is formed with:

  • particular rivers, creeks, and watersheds
  • specific fishing sites, crossings, and travel routes
  • defined territories, boundaries, and use areas
  • named mountains, valleys, and gathering places

Authority arises from knowing **which** place, not just *a* place.

How relationships are established

Relationships to lands and waters are established through:

  • first encounter or settlement
  • protection and defense of place
  • sustained use and stewardship
  • acts of sacrifice or consequence tied to that place
  • agreements with neighboring peoples
  • witnessing and feast acknowledgment

Each place holds its own legal record.

Responsibility bound to place

Responsibilities tied to specific lands and waters include:

  • protection of ecological balance
  • maintenance of access and passage
  • restraint in use and extraction
  • correction of harm occurring there
  • respect for beings dependent on that place

Responsibility does not transfer automatically to other places.

Water as connective jurisdiction

Waters connect territories and peoples.

Relationship to water requires:

  • accountability for downstream impact
  • coordination with neighboring jurisdictions
  • heightened care due to shared dependence

Control over water carries shared responsibility.

Memory and place

Relationships to place are preserved through:

  • adaawk naming specific locations
  • living witnesses recalling use and events
  • feast acknowledgment tying authority to place
  • intergenerational teaching of routes and sites

Unnamed places lose protection.

Limits of place-based authority

Authority tied to one place:

  • does not extend automatically to others
  • is constrained by overlapping relationships
  • is limited by past agreements and history

Overreach beyond place weakens legitimacy.

Consequences of violating place-relationship

When relationship to land or water is violated:

  • imbalance occurs at that place
  • responsibility is triggered
  • authority may be challenged
  • restoration becomes necessary

Places remember misuse.

Core principle

Authority follows relationship to place. To know a land or water is to answer for it.

Future links