Jurisdictional responsibility

From We Are Ts'msyen
Revision as of 19:52, 11 January 2026 by Amusterer (talk | contribs) (initiation arm)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Jurisdictional responsibility

Jurisdictional responsibility is the duty to govern, protect, and answer for a place, a people, and the relationships that exist within them. Jurisdiction is not control alone—it is accountability.

Authority over a territory exists only where responsibility is actively upheld.

What jurisdiction means

Jurisdiction includes responsibility for:

  • land and waters
  • people living within the territory
  • passage, access, and movement
  • relationships with neighboring peoples
  • impacts caused within the territory

Jurisdiction is exercised through care, not domination.

Source of jurisdiction

Jurisdiction arises from:

  • historical relationship to place
  • acts of protection, sacrifice, or consequence
  • witnessing and feast acknowledgment
  • continuous stewardship across generations
  • recognition by other houses and peoples

Jurisdiction cannot be created by declaration alone.

Responsibilities within jurisdiction

Jurisdictional responsibility includes:

  • protecting the integrity of the land and waters
  • ensuring balance and restraint in use
  • addressing harm that occurs within the territory
  • enforcing accountability through proper process
  • maintaining access and safety according to law
  • teaching future generations their duties

Failure to act is itself a jurisdictional failure.

Limits of jurisdiction

Jurisdiction is not absolute.

It is limited by:

  • overlapping responsibilities with other houses
  • established agreements and relationships
  • obligations arising from past events
  • accountability to witnesses and adaawk

Jurisdiction exercised without regard to responsibility becomes illegitimate.

Jurisdiction during disruption

During disruption:

  • jurisdiction is held in trust
  • responsibilities are preserved, even if practice is interrupted
  • authority may be constrained but not erased
  • restoration remains required

Disruption does not transfer jurisdiction by default.

Disputed jurisdiction

When jurisdiction is disputed:

  • history is examined
  • adaawk are consulted
  • witnesses are recalled
  • feast acknowledgment clarifies responsibility

Unresolved jurisdiction remains an active legal matter.

Consequences of failing jurisdiction

When jurisdictional responsibility is violated:

  • legitimacy erodes
  • intervention may occur
  • authority may be limited or withdrawn
  • obligation follows the name until addressed

Jurisdiction must answer for its impacts.

Core principle

Jurisdiction exists only where responsibility is upheld. To hold a place is to answer for it.

Future links